Stevenson portrays Edward Hyde as an inhuman creature with mere instincts and no human emotions or similarities. ‘Mr Hyde was pale and dwarfish, he gave an impression of deformity without any nameable malformation’, is the description of Mr Hyde from Mr Utterson. He says that Mr Hyde looks deformed which implies that he is not very healthy or normal. He was also described as ‘pale’ which also suggests him being ill or unfit.
‘Not all these together could explain the hither to unknown disgust, loathing and fear with which Mr Utterson regarded him ‘, and, ‘If I ever read Satan’s signature upon a face, it is on that of your new friend’, are both Mr Utterson’s impressions of Mr Hyde. He does not even know him and he is already repulsed by him by his mere appearance and manner although he cannot find an actual feature which causes this hate.
In the opening chapter, Mr Utterson’s distant relative, Mr Enfield tells him about a recent event with Mr Hyde, where he ‘trampled calmly over the child’s body and left her screaming on the ground’. The paradox ‘trampled calmly’ stands out to the reader as trampling usually includes wild and aggressive manner, however Mr Hyde tramples calmly which suggests that he is not particularly caring or emotional. When Mr Hyde is then captured and brought back to the scene of the little girl and a crowd of people, Mr Enfield describes him as being ‘frightened too, I could see that-but carrying it off sir, really like Satan’.
Using intelligent and tactical word choices Stevenson is able to give Hyde an unnameable edge of dislike making him a key character in the novel. Stevenson never gives a clear physical description of what Hyde looks like but the reader still knows he is detestable and displeasing making the character very significant.
Hyde is described as having something ‘wrong with his appearance’. By using the adjective ‘wrong’ it makes the reader question how can somebody look wrong? This traps the reader in a difficult situation of trying to deduce what a ‘wrong’ person could look like making them us their imagination. This is significant because Hyde has not been given an exact physical appearance but the reader already views him as unlikeable.
Stevenson later portrays Hyde as an ‘extraordinary-looking man’. This intrigues the reader because they have already established Hyde with negative associations but by using the adjective ‘extraordinary’ Stevenson confuses the reader slightly because usually this word means new and amazing things. By using this adjective to describe a disliked character it emphasises how ‘extraordinarily’ disgusting he is.
The way in which Hyde acts also gives some insight of his personality, Stevenson writes Hyde ‘snarled aloud into a savage laugh’. The verb ‘snarled’ implies animal like behaviour and the adjective ‘savage’ gives the effect of an uneducated caveman-like person making Hyde appear like a unlikeable person who does not fit into society. The way in which Hyde acts is the complete opposite of what was expected, so making his character stand out.
Hyde is also portrayed by Stevenson as ‘pale and dwarfish’ this links into the idea of the proper Victorian society because people who were different in any form were often disregarded and viewed as less worthy which Hyde often is.
Mr. Hyde is Dr. Jekyll’s evil alter ego who indulges in various undisclosed vices. He’s smaller, younger, more energetic, and just basically a malevolent, villainous guy. He’s frequently compared to a monkey or an ape, suggesting a certain inhumanity or bestiality. And although no one can really pinpoint a particular deformity, they all agree that he has one—one that makes him a twisted, dark man who manages to inspire fear, disgust, and loathing even from afar. He is also described repeatedly as “timid yet bold.”
He indulges in many undisclosed pleasures, but the main characteristic we see is that of violence. Based on the crimes we see, his predilection for violence isn’t like a gang member’s because he doesn’t hold any affiliations or have any conception of honour and respect. Nor is he really like a schoolyard bully because he’s not particularly bigger or stronger than the people he beats up—not to mention that he doesn’t do it in front of crowds or to make himself look good. No, he simply likes beating people up. He feels pleasure when he engages in violence.
“He had in his hand a heavy cane, with which he was trifling; but he answered never a word, and seemed to listen with an ill-contained impatience. And then all of a sudden he broke out in a great flame of anger, stamping with his foot, brandishing the cane, and carrying on (as the maid described it) like a madman. The old gentleman took a step back, with the air of one very much surprised and a trifle hurt; and at that Mr. Hyde broke out of all bounds and clubbed him to the earth. And next moment, with ape-like fury, he was trampling his victim under foot and hailing down a storm of blows, under which the bones were audibly shattered and the body jumped upon the roadway. At the horror of these sights and sounds, the maid fainted. “
Mr. Hyde’s name is also significant, as he is both a persona that Dr. Jekyll hides behind and a hidden man:
“Mr. Hyde had numbered few familiars—even the master of the servant maid had only seen him twice; his family could nowhere be traced; he had never been photographed; and the few who could describe him differed widely, as common observers will. Only on one point were they agreed; and that was the haunting sense of unexpressed deformity with which the fugitive impressed his beholders.”
Perhaps the most interesting aspect of Mr. Hyde to discuss is his death. We aren’t really sure at the end how Mr. Hyde died. Well, suicide, you say—but who committed the suicide? We know that Hyde is afraid of death (and probably the Hell that, according to Victorian England, awaits him) and that the threat of suicide is Jekyll’s only weapon against him. So one would think Jekyll somehow killed himself and Hyde right after writing his confession. That’s the easy explanation.
Jekyll did say that Hyde was taking over and growing stronger. If the last thing Jekyll was able to pull off was writing his last “document,” then it sounds like Hyde took over before the death occurred. So did Hyde kill himself? And does that mean he killed Jekyll? You could say that Jekyll was already dead by that time, and that Hyde had taken over completely. After all, it is Hyde’s dead body that we see, not Jekyll’s.
However you could also argue that it’s irrelevant to ask who killed himself, or who killed whom, because at the end of the day, Hyde and Jekyll aren’t separate entities. They share the same body and the same memory. You could even go so far as to say that Jekyll’s attempted division failed; man can’t be separated into two tidy halves, representing what humans are actually like not what they want to look like.